Business Overview: Onto Innovation Inc. (NYSE: ONTO)

---

Executive Summary

Onto Innovation Inc. is a semiconductor process-control company that designs, manufactures, and supports the metrology, inspection, and lithography tools chipmakers and outsourced assembly-and-test (OSAT) houses use to measure and verify wafers and packages during production. The company was formed in 2019 through the merger of Nanometrics Incorporated and Rudolph Technologies, Inc., and is headquartered in Wilmington, Massachusetts, with major engineering and manufacturing sites in Milpitas, CA; Tucson, AZ; and Bloomington, MN.

Onto reported $1.005 billion in revenue for fiscal 2025 (ended January 3, 2026) and serves more than 190 customers across 25+ countries. It matters disproportionately to the current AI buildout because its tools sit at the center of advanced packaging — the 2.5D/3D integration and high-bandwidth-memory (HBM) stacking techniques that let chipmakers keep scaling AI accelerators as traditional transistor shrinks slow down. By mid-2026, AI- and HBM-driven packaging demand had pushed quarterly revenue growth above 35% year-over-year and backlog past $1 billion for the first time in the company's history.

Onto operates as a single reportable business built around one integrated process-control franchise rather than multiple distinct operating segments, so this overview does not include a separate Business Segments section.

---

1. Core Business Model & How They Work

Onto sells capital equipment and software that fabs and OSATs use to inspect and measure wafers and packages at nearly every step of production, then monetizes the installed base through service, upgrades, and recurring software/consumables revenue.

[Semiconductor/Packaging R&D & Node Design] ➡️ [Fab & OSAT Capital Equipment Investment]
     ➡️ [Onto Tool Qualification as "Tool of Record"] ➡️ [High-Volume Production Deployment]
     ➡️ [Recurring Revenue: Service, Spares, Software Licenses, Tool Upgrades]

Key Operational Drivers

1. Tool-of-Record Qualification: Before a customer deploys an Onto system in production, it must pass months of correlation testing against the customer's actual process line. Once qualified, a tool is difficult and risky to swap out, which anchors recurring revenue (service contracts, software, consumables) for years.
2. Diversified End-Market Exposure: Onto sells into three distinct demand cycles — advanced nodes (logic/memory below 10nm, tied to new-node ramps), advanced packaging (2.5D/3D integration, HBM stacking, panel-level packaging, tied to assembly volumes rather than node cycles), and specialty devices (LEDs, MEMS, CMOS image sensors, SiC/GaN power devices, RF filters). This spreads cyclicality across markets that don't always peak together.
3. Bolt-on Technology M&A: Onto extends its measurement portfolio through targeted acquisitions rather than building every capability from scratch — most recently Semilab USA (closed Q4 2025), which added the FAaST, CnCV, and MBIR materials-characterization product lines, and a $720 million investment for a 27% stake in Rigaku, aimed at X-ray-based metrology for next-generation 3D packages.
4. Volume Purchase Agreements: Large customers increasingly lock in multi-year capacity commitments — Onto disclosed an HBM-related volume purchase agreement worth more than $240 million running through 2027, which converts what would otherwise be lumpy capital-equipment orders into multi-year visibility.

---

2. Product Portfolio

---

3. Competitive Landscape

                     ADVANCED-PACKAGING / AI REVENUE EXPOSURE
                Low  ─────────────────────────────────────  High
        Broad   │                                  [ONTO]       │
   PROCESS-      │     [KLA]                                    │
   CONTROL        │                          [Nova / NVMI]      │
   PORTFOLIO      │                                              │
        Narrow  │                                    [Camtek]   │
                Low  ─────────────────────────────────────  High

• KLA Corporation — The dominant, much-larger process-control company across the entire fab (optical + e-beam inspection, metrology). Competes with Onto in thin-film/OCD metrology and advanced-packaging inspection; KLA's scale and breadth make it the benchmark Onto is chasing, though packaging is a smaller share of KLA's far larger revenue base.
• Nova Ltd. (NVMI) — Onto's closest head-to-head rival in thin-film/OCD metrology and the primary competitor in integrated metrology; also expanding into advanced packaging via its WMC platform.
• Camtek Ltd. (CAMT) — The most concentrated pure-play in advanced-packaging inspection, with roughly three-quarters of its revenue tied to AI-driven packaging; smaller and more narrowly focused than Onto, but a fast-growing, direct competitor in the same AI/HBM upcycle.
• Ushio, Inc. and Canon, Inc. — Compete in advanced-packaging lithography against Onto's JetStep line.
• GigaVis Co. Ltd. — Competes in panel-market inspection as panel-level packaging adoption grows.
• PDF Solutions, Inc. — Competes in process-control/yield-management software.
• Opto-electronics, discrete, and industrial/scientific markets — Described by Onto itself as fragmented, with numerous competitors and no dominant player.

---

4. Strategic Strengths & Risks

Competitive Strengths (The Moat)

• Tool-of-Record Embedding: Once qualified into a customer's production flow, an Onto system is costly and operationally risky to displace, anchoring multi-year service and software revenue.
• Breadth Across the AI Packaging Stack: Onto's growth is split across HBM memory and 2.5D logic packaging rather than a single architecture, which the company and outside analysts both cite as reducing dependence on any one AI packaging approach.
• Multi-Year Demand Visibility: Backlog exceeded $1 billion for the first time in 2026, with the bulk tied to 2026–2027 deliveries, and a disclosed HBM volume purchase agreement worth over $240 million running through 2027.
• Inorganic Technology Extension: The Semilab acquisition and the $720 million, 27%-stake investment in Rigaku extend Onto's measurement capability (materials characterization, X-ray metrology) into next-generation 3D packaging without multi-year internal R&D buildout.

Strategic Risks & Vulnerabilities

1. Customer Concentration: Onto's top three customers accounted for roughly 49% of FY2025 revenue (20% + 15% + 14%), concentrated among a handful of leading-edge logic/memory manufacturers and OSATs — loss of, or a slowdown at, any one of them would materially affect results.
2. Scale Disadvantage vs. KLA: KLA remains far larger and more diversified across the entire process-control market; Onto's gross margin (49.7% GAAP in FY2025) trails the scale economics of the category leader.
3. Cyclicality & Mix Pressure: FY2025 revenue grew only 1.8% and GAAP gross margin compressed (49.7% vs. 52.2% in FY2024) amid acquisition-integration costs and a softer advanced-node spending environment, before the 2026 AI-packaging reacceleration — a reminder that semiconductor capex cycles can reverse quickly.
4. Export Controls & Tariffs: The company's own risk disclosures flag that U.S. export-control licensing requirements can cause temporary revenue losses in China and other markets, and that tariffs have raised supply-chain costs.
5. Execution Risk on Packaging Bet: A large share of the current growth narrative rests on sustained AI/HBM capex; management itself has guided to roughly 80% growth in advanced packaging for 2026 — a target that assumes continued hyperscaler AI infrastructure spending.

---

5. Financial Overview

---

6. Summary Conclusion

Onto Innovation sits in an unusually favorable spot in the current semiconductor cycle: its process-control tools are needed precisely where the industry is shifting its capital spending — advanced packaging, HBM stacking, and 2.5D/3D integration for AI accelerators — while its exposure to advanced-node and specialty-device markets cushions the business when any single end market cools. Its moat rests less on being the single largest player (KLA remains bigger and broader) and more on deep tool-of-record embedding, a broadening measurement portfolio built through disciplined bolt-on M&A (Semilab, Rigaku), and multi-year customer commitments like the >$240 million HBM volume purchase agreement that give unusually strong forward visibility for a capital-equipment vendor.

The central risk is the mirror image of that strength: a meaningful share of Onto's near-term growth is now wagered on the durability of AI-driven HBM and advanced-packaging capex, layered on top of real customer concentration (roughly half of revenue from three customers) and a structural scale gap versus KLA. If AI infrastructure spending moderates faster than the ~80% 2026 advanced-packaging growth management has guided to, the swing from FY2025's muted 1.8% growth to 2026's 35%+ quarterly growth could reverse just as quickly as it appeared.