Gran Tierra Energy Inc.

# Business Overview: Gran Tierra Energy Inc. (NYSE American: GTE)

---

Executive Summary

Gran Tierra Energy Inc. is a Delaware-incorporated oil and gas exploration and production (E&P) company headquartered in Calgary, Alberta, with producing assets concentrated in Colombia, Canada (Alberta), and Ecuador. The company focuses on conventional basins with established infrastructure rather than frontier exploration, and pursues an active portfolio high-grading strategy — acquiring and divesting assets to concentrate capital on its highest-return properties.

2025 was a year of production growth (average working interest production up about 32% to 45,709 BOEPD) paired with a large GAAP net loss driven by a non-cash ceiling test impairment, underscoring the commodity-price sensitivity inherent to the E&P business model.

---

1. Core Business Model & How They Work

Gran Tierra explores for, develops, and produces oil, natural gas, and NGLs, selling production at benchmark-referenced prices into international and regional markets.

[ Exploration & Development (Colombia, Canada, Ecuador) ] ➡️ [ Oil/Gas/NGL Production (45,709 BOEPD avg. 2025) ] ➡️ [ Sales via International Marketers (Colombia/Ecuador) or Marketers/Aggregators (Canada) ] ➡️ [ Revenue Hedged Against Price Risk ] ➡️ [ Free Cash Flow ➡️ Debt Reduction / Reinvestment ]

Key Operational Drivers

1. Three-Country Asset Base: Colombia represents 46% of proved reserves (Middle Magdalena Valley and Putumayo Basin, 20 blocks), Canada 38% (12 areas in Alberta, since reduced to 11 after the post-year-end Simonette divestiture), and Ecuador 16% (five Oriente Basin blocks under production sharing contracts, operated by Gran Tierra).
2. Revenue Geography Skews to Colombia: Colombia generated 70% of 2025 revenue, Canada 19%, and Ecuador 11% — Colombian and Ecuadorian oil sales are denominated in U.S. dollars, while Canadian sales are in Canadian dollars, creating a natural partial currency hedge.
3. Benchmark Pricing with Hedging: Prices reference ICE Brent, WTI, and AECO natural gas (adjusted for quality and transportation), and the company actively uses financial hedges to manage commodity price risk.
4. Portfolio High-Grading: Active management of the asset base through acquisitions and divestitures — exemplified by the post-2025 divestiture of the Simonette area in Canada — concentrates capital on the highest-return properties.
5. Capital Discipline and Deleveraging: The 2026 capital program of $120-160 million directs over 90% to development (not exploration), with explicit strategic emphasis on free cash flow generation and debt reduction, reflected in a major post-year-end debt exchange (88% of 9.500% notes due 2029 swapped for new 9.750% notes due 2031).

---

2. Business Segments

Gran Tierra organizes its disclosure by country/geography rather than product-line segments, reflecting the E&P industry's geographic risk and regulatory profile.

┌───────────────────────────────────┐
│       Gran Tierra Energy Inc.        │
└────────────────┬──────────────────┘
                  │
     ┌────────────┼─────────────────┐
     ▼             ▼                 ▼
┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐  ┌──────────────┐
│ Colombia    │ │ Canada      │  │ Ecuador        │
│ 46% reserves │ │ 38% reserves │  │ 16% reserves    │
│ 70% revenue  │ │ 19% revenue  │  │ 11% revenue     │
│ (Mid. Magd.   │ │ (Alberta,    │  │ (Oriente Basin,  │
│  Valley,       │ │  11 areas     │  │  5 PSC blocks,    │
│  Putumayo)      │ │  post-2025)    │  │  operator of all)  │
└───────────┘ └───────────┘  └──────────────┘

---

3. Product Portfolio

---

4. Competitive Landscape

      LATIN AMERICA / NORTH AMERICA E&P POSITIONING
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ High │                                                   │
│  ▲   │   [National Oil Companies]                         │
│  F   │   (Ecopetrol, Petroecuador —                        │
│  I   │    greater financial resources,                      │
│  N   │    local regulatory advantages)                       │
│  A   │                      [Gran Tierra]                     │
│  N   │                      (mid-size, multi-country,         │
│  C   │                       conventional-basin focus)          │
│  I   │  [Canadian independents]                                │
│  A   │  (comparable scale, single-country focus)                │
│  L   │                                                        │
│ Low  │                                                     │
│      └───────────────────────────────────────────────────► │
│       Low           FINANCIAL RESOURCES              High   │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Gran Tierra competes with local and multinational E&P firms for properties, drilling/oilfield equipment, skilled personnel, and transportation capacity. In Colombia and Ecuador, it competes against national oil companies (e.g., Ecopetrol, Petroecuador) that often have greater financial resources and local regulatory advantages; in Canada, it competes against numerous independent producers in Alberta of comparable or larger scale. The company also notes broader competition from other energy industries (renewables, alternative fuels) for long-term capital and market relevance.

---

5. Strategic Strengths & Risks

Strengths (The Moat)

• Geographic diversification across three producing countries: Colombia, Canada, and Ecuador provide some insulation against single-country political, regulatory, or currency risk relative to a single-basin peer.
• Operator control: Gran Tierra operates the majority of its Colombia/Ecuador blocks and all five Ecuador blocks, giving it direct control over development pace and cost discipline rather than depending on a non-operating partner.
• Active portfolio management: A demonstrated willingness to divest underperforming assets (e.g., Simonette, Canada) and refinance debt (the 2029-to-2031 notes exchange) shows a management team actively managing balance sheet risk rather than passively absorbing it.

Risks

• Commodity price exposure: The 2025 net loss of $193.1 million was driven substantially by a non-cash $136.3 million ceiling test impairment — a direct consequence of oil and gas price-dependent asset valuations under full-cost accounting rules.
• High leverage: $740.5 million of Senior Notes against $82.9 million of cash at year-end 2025 represents meaningful leverage for a mid-size E&P company, even after the post-year-end debt exchange extended maturities.
• Operating netback compression: Netback fell to $20.18/boe from $31.99/boe in 2024 (down 37%), reflecting lower realized prices and/or higher costs — a direct hit to free cash flow generation even as production volumes grew.
• Geopolitical and regulatory risk: Operating in Colombia and Ecuador exposes the company to political, fiscal, and security risks that are generally higher than in Canada or the United States.

---

6. Financial Overview

---

7. Summary Conclusion

Gran Tierra Energy has built a geographically diversified, operator-controlled E&P platform across Colombia, Canada, and Ecuador, and delivered real production growth in 2025. However, the business remains fundamentally exposed to commodity price cycles — a large non-cash impairment drove a significant GAAP net loss even as production and Adjusted EBITDA both grew — and the company carries meaningful leverage that it is actively managing through asset divestitures and debt refinancing. The central forward question is whether continued portfolio high-grading and the 2026 capital program's focus on development (rather than exploration) can restore per-barrel netback economics faster than commodity prices or geopolitical risk in its Colombia/Ecuador operations erode them.