Business Overview: Zion Oil & Gas, Inc. (OTCQB: ZNOG)

---

Executive Summary

Zion Oil & Gas, Inc. is a Delaware-incorporated oil and gas exploration company that has spent roughly 25 years pursuing petroleum exploration in Israel, with its headquarters in Dallas, Texas and a branch office in Caesarea, Israel. The company's business is built entirely around a single exploration license area: the New Megiddo Valleys License 434 (NMVL 434), covering approximately 75,000 acres (302 sq km), approved in September 2023 and running through September 2026 (with up to four possible one-year extensions).

Zion is explicitly a pre-revenue, exploration-stage company: it has no proved reserves, no production, and no operating income, and its auditors have issued a going-concern qualification. This is an accurate and important description of the company's financial reality, not a reason to treat it as a non-operating entity — Zion is actively drilling and testing wells (most recently the MJ-02 well, where it completed drilling and casing the horizontal section in September 2026, with stimulation and testing expected afterward) and funds its exploration program primarily through continuous equity issuance under its Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan.

Why it matters: Zion is effectively a long-duration call option on a single, geologically unproven exploration thesis — that commercially viable oil and/or gas exists beneath its Israeli license area — funded almost entirely by retail shareholder capital rather than operating cash flow, making it a clean illustration of pure exploration-stage risk with essentially none of the typical moat sources (scale, brand, switching costs) available to an operating company.

---

1. Core Business Model & How They Work

Unlike a producing oil & gas company, Zion's "business model" today is a capital-raising-to-exploration cycle: it raises money from shareholders (largely through a continuous stock purchase/reinvestment plan), spends that capital on drilling and well operations within its single Israeli license, and hopes to convert exploration success into commercial production and, eventually, conventional oil & gas revenue.

   SHAREHOLDERS / DRIP PARTICIPANTS
   (Dividend Reinvestment & Stock
    Purchase Plan — ~$16.26M raised
    in 2024)
              |
              v
   ZION OIL & GAS, INC. (Dallas, TX)
   Capital funds exploration ops in
   Caesarea, Israel branch office
              |
              v
   NMVL 434 LICENSE (Israel)
   - Seismic/geological work
   - Drilling & well operations
     (e.g., MJ-01, MJ-02 wells)
   - Owns drilling rig via Zion
     Drilling, Inc. / Zion Drilling
     Services, Inc.
              |
              v
   IF exploration succeeds:
   Stimulation, testing, completion
   -> potential discovery
              |
              v
   IF commercial: production,
   subject to 12.5% government
   royalty + 6% foundation payments
   -> Zion's first operating revenue

No step past "exploration/testing" has yet been reached at commercial scale — the entire model today is pre-revenue capital deployment against geological risk, which is the central fact investors must understand about this company.

---

2. Business Segments

Zion Oil & Gas operates a single exploration program in a single license area and does not report separate business segments. This section is omitted per the single-segment rule.

---

3. Key Offerings

Zion has no commercial products, since it is a pre-revenue exploration company; the table below instead summarizes its key operating assets/programs, which function as its "offerings" in lieu of products:

---

4. Competitive Landscape

Zion names Givot Olam, Globe Exploration, and the Noble Energy/Delek Group consortium as competitors in Israeli oil & gas exploration, though the comparison is somewhat different from typical competitive dynamics:

• Noble Energy/Delek Group consortium: The dominant commercial success story in Israeli hydrocarbons, having developed major offshore natural gas fields (e.g., Leviathan, Tamar); operates at a vastly larger scale than Zion and primarily offshore, a different geological and capital setting than Zion's onshore program.
• Givot Olam and Globe Exploration: Smaller, more direct onshore-exploration peers pursuing similar unproven onshore Israeli prospects, facing similar capital and geological risk profiles to Zion.
• Shared constraint — not just competition: Zion explicitly flags limited availability of Israeli oilfield services, equipment, and personnel as a constraint shared across all onshore explorers in the country, meaning competitors are also partly bottlenecked by the same scarce local service base Zion depends on.

Because Zion is pre-revenue, "competition" here is less about market share and more about competing for scarce local drilling/service capacity and for investor capital to fund exploration.

---

5. Strategic Strengths & Risks

Strengths (potential long-term asset, not a conventional moat):

• Long-standing license relationship and geological knowledge of its specific Israeli license area, built over roughly 25 years, which a new entrant could not quickly replicate given Israel's limited number of available exploration licenses.
• Owned drilling rig, reducing reliance on the scarce local contracted-rig market that constrains competitors.

Risks:

• Going-concern doubt: The auditor's going-concern qualification reflects real, material doubt about the company's ability to continue funding operations.
• Total dependence on continuous equity financing: Cash was described as sufficient only through May 2025 as of the FY2024 10-K, with roughly 57% of 2024 DRIP proceeds coming from a single participant — a significant concentration risk in the company's own funding base.
• Zero revenue, zero proved reserves: There is no operating income to fall back on if financing slows.

<br>

• License expiration risk: NMVL 434 runs only through September 2026 (with possible extensions); failure to renew would eliminate the company's only exploration area.
• Geological/technical risk: Only about 500 wells have ever been drilled in Israel, mostly shallow, reflecting how unproven onshore Israeli exploration remains; the MJ-01 well's stuck tool string illustrates real operational risk.
• Regional conflict exposure: Operations in Israel are exposed to regional conflict risk affecting personnel safety, shipping, and visas.
• Royalty/foundation payment burden: Any future production would be reduced by a 12.5% Israeli government royalty plus 6% split between two foundations, compressing potential economics even if a discovery is commercialized.
• OTCQB listing risk: Must maintain minimum bid price and market capitalization requirements to remain listed.

---

6. Financial Overview

---

7. Summary Conclusion

Zion Oil & Gas is a legitimate, actively-operating exploration company rather than a dormant entity — it holds a real exploration license, owns and operates drilling equipment, and is executing an active, multi-well drilling and testing program in Israel, most recently completing the horizontal section of the MJ-02 well in September 2026. But by the company's own admission it remains entirely pre-revenue, with no proved reserves, a going-concern qualification, and complete dependence on continuous shareholder capital through its Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan to keep exploring. Zion possesses essentially none of the conventional moat sources available to an operating company; its entire investment thesis is a binary, long-duration bet on geological success in a single Israeli license area, with the imminent stimulation and testing of the MJ-02 well representing the nearest actual catalyst.