Business Overview: McGraw Hill, Inc. (NYSE: MH)

---

Executive Summary

McGraw Hill, Inc. is a global provider of education solutions spanning K-12, higher education, and professional learning, combining proprietary content, software, and data with AI-driven personalization. The company completed its IPO in July 2025 and trades on the NYSE as "MH," though it remains a "controlled company" under significant influence from private equity owner Platinum Equity.

McGraw Hill matters because of its entrenched position in U.S. education: it is a top-two provider serving roughly 91% of public K-12 districts and about 81% of U.S. higher education institutions, plus content used at an estimated 94% of U.S. medical schools through its AccessMedicine platform. Fiscal 2026 (year ended March 31, 2026) revenue was $2,102.8 million, with net income of $35.3 million — the company's first profitable fiscal year after losses in FY2025 and FY2024.

---

1. Core Business Model & How They Work

McGraw Hill sells content and software platforms to institutions (school districts, colleges, universities) under multi-year licensing arrangements, increasingly bundling proprietary content with adaptive learning software.

[ Proprietary Content + Software + Data ] ⟹ [ AI-Personalized Learning Platforms ]
                                                        │
                                                        ▼
        [ K-12 School Districts ] [ Colleges/Universities ] [ Medical/Engineering Professionals ] [ International Markets ]
                                                        │
                                                        ▼
                  [ Multi-Year Licenses (often paid up front) + Inclusive Access Programs ]

Key Operational Drivers

1. Platform-Based Delivery: Products like Connect (higher ed), ALEKS (adaptive learning across K-12 and higher ed), and ConnectEd/Open Learning (K-12) shift the company from pure textbook publishing toward recurring software-based engagement.
2. Deep Institutional Penetration: Serving ~91% of U.S. public K-12 districts and ~81% of U.S. higher ed institutions means McGraw Hill is already embedded in the vast majority of the addressable U.S. market, making growth more about expanding wallet share than winning new logos.
3. Up-Front, Multi-Year Payment Structure: School districts typically pay for multi-year licenses up front, giving McGraw Hill predictable cash flow timing even though revenue itself is seasonal.
4. AI Integration: The company is using AI to personalize learning content, while simultaneously facing risk from AI-generated competing educational materials and unauthorized use of its own content to train outside AI models.

---

2. Business Segments

┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                      McGraw Hill, Inc.                            │
├────────────┬─────────────────┬──────────────────┬─────────────┤
│   K-12      │ Higher Education │ Global Professional│International │
│  (42% rev)  │   (42% rev)      │    (7% rev)         │  (9% rev)    │
└────────────┴─────────────────┴──────────────────┴─────────────┘

K-12 (42% of FY2026 revenue, down from 46%): Core, supplemental, and intervention curricula plus AP/electives via ConnectEd and the next-generation Open Learning platform. Higher Education (42%, up from 37%): Led by the Connect platform and "Evergreen" continuously-updated content model, serving ~81% of U.S. institutions. Global Professional (7%): Medical and engineering content including AccessMedicine, used at ~94% of U.S. medical schools. International (9%, down from 10%): Adaptations of U.S. content sold in 100+ countries and 80+ languages.

---

3. Product Portfolio

---

4. Competitive Landscape

McGraw Hill names a long list of competitors spanning traditional publishers, specialized content providers, and open-resource alternatives: AMBOSS, Amplify, Cengage, Curriculum Associates, Elsevier, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Macmillan Learning, Pearson, RELX, Savvas, and Wolters Kluwer. It also explicitly flags competition from free or low-cost open educational resources and AI-generated materials as a structural threat to its licensing model.

                    EDUCATION CONTENT POSITIONING
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ High         [Pearson] [RELX] [Elsevier] [Wolters Kluwer]       │
│ Breadth              (global, multi-vertical publishers)        │
│                                                                   │
│                          [MCGRAW HILL]                           │
│                             (top-two in both K-12 and Higher Ed) │
│ Low          [AMBOSS] [Curriculum Associates] [Savvas]           │
│ Breadth              (narrower subject/grade focus)               │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
      Narrow Vertical Focus ─────────────────▶ Broad Multi-Segment Reach

---

5. Strategic Strengths & Risks

Competitive Strengths (The Moat)

• Near-Universal Institutional Penetration: Reaching ~91% of public K-12 districts and ~81% of higher ed institutions means McGraw Hill is the incumbent in the vast majority of relevant U.S. adoption decisions.
• Multi-Year Adoption Cycles: State and district textbook/platform adoption cycles are typically multi-year, giving incumbents like McGraw Hill durable revenue visibility once selected.
• Medical Content Dominance: AccessMedicine's reach into ~94% of U.S. medical schools reflects a specialized content moat that is hard for a new entrant to replicate quickly given accreditation and curriculum alignment requirements.

Strategic Risks & Vulnerabilities

1. Open Educational Resources and AI: Free or low-cost alternatives, including AI-generated materials, directly threaten the paid-licensing model that underpins McGraw Hill's revenue.
2. Policy and Funding Dependence: Changes to state adoption cycles, academic standards, or federal/state education funding (including possible restructuring of the U.S. Department of Education) could disrupt purchasing cycles with little warning.
3. Declining Enrollment and Inclusive Access Risk: Falling college enrollment, plus a proposed state rule that would require students to actively opt in to Inclusive Access programs, both threaten a key higher-ed revenue channel.
4. High Leverage: $2,632.3 million of face-value debt as of March 31, 2026 constrains financial flexibility and makes the company sensitive to interest rate and refinancing risk.
5. Controlled-Company Governance: Significant influence by Platinum Equity under NYSE's "controlled company" exemption means public shareholders have fewer governance protections than at a widely-held company.

---

6. Financial Overview

---

7. Summary Conclusion

McGraw Hill's moat is built on decades of institutional incumbency: once a school district or university has adopted its platforms under a multi-year cycle, switching to a competitor requires re-running an adoption process that districts and institutions are often reluctant to repeat frequently. That incumbency shows up directly in its market share figures — reaching the vast majority of U.S. K-12 districts and higher ed institutions.

The company's first profitable fiscal year as a newly public entity is a meaningful inflection point, but the structural threat from free and AI-generated educational content, combined with a heavy debt load and controlled-company governance structure, means McGraw Hill's moat is being tested from multiple directions even as its core institutional relationships remain strong.